{"id":1175,"date":"2021-03-17T13:28:00","date_gmt":"2021-03-17T14:28:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.global-kite.com\/?p=1175"},"modified":"2023-10-26T12:59:28","modified_gmt":"2023-10-26T12:59:28","slug":"responsible-down-standard-is-down-outdoor-gear-ethical-or-eco-friendly-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.global-kite.com\/index.php\/2021\/03\/17\/responsible-down-standard-is-down-outdoor-gear-ethical-or-eco-friendly-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Responsible Down Standard: Is Down Outdoor Gear Ethical or Eco-Friendly?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Since adopting a plant-based diet and giving up all animal foods, I\u2019ve realized just how much of my outdoor gear contains animal products. Ski gloves made from goat leather, socks and base layers made of wool, and my sleeping bag and warm jacket made of down. It seems like almost every time I\u2019m on an outdoor adventure, I\u2019m wearing or using something made from animals. It wasn\u2019t until I ditched meat in my diet that I started to think about my ethics in regards to utilizing animal products in my gear, particularly whether down is ethical and humane. I’d heard about the Responsible Down Standard when shopping for down sleeping bags and jackets, but I wasn’t quite sure what that meant.<\/p>\n

I want to buy gear that is ethical and eco-friendly and to support outdoor companies that are making efforts to reduce their environmental footprint. At the same time, I want to minimize the harm caused to animals in the making of my gear. So I\u2019ve been doing some research on the ethical and environmental implications of common materials in outdoor gear, and in this blog post, I share what I\u2019ve learned about down.<\/p>\n

With down being one of the lightest, warmest, and most compressible insulating materials for sleeping bags, swapping down for synthetic often means carrying a heavier and bulkier sleeping bag and often sacrificing temperature performance. As someone who makes recommendations for the most functional outdoor gear (where weight and performance are big factors), I\u2019ve felt a bit conflicted about this. It\u2019s led me to ask whether down is sustainable, ethical, and eco-friendly and to dig into what the Responsible Down Standard means. Touted as a natural, eco-friendly material, I also wondered how down compares to synthetic alternatives in terms of environmental impact.<\/p>\n

Advance warning, this blog post is detailed, and may be a little difficult to read, but you\u2019re likely to learn some new, surprising things about down. My goal with this blog post isn\u2019t to steer you in a certain direction or to make you feel guilty about the gear you own or even buy in the future. I personally own a number of down sleeping bags and jackets that I love. Instead, my hope is that as we strive to be more conscious consumers and that this information will help us make more thoughtful, ethical, and responsible choices when it comes to future outdoor gear purchases.<\/p>\n

In this blog post, I share what I\u2019ve found in regards to how down is produced, all about the Responsible Down Standard, and tips for making ethical and eco-friendly choices when shopping for jackets, sleeping bags, and other products commonly made from down.<\/h4>\n
\n
\n
\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

What is down?<\/h2>\n

Down is the light, fluffy undercoat of waterfowl (typically ducks and geese) that keeps them nice and toasty. These quill-less fibers are one of nature\u2019s most effective insulating materials. Down is extremely light and compressible with an excellent warmth-to-weight ratio, making it the material of choice in backpacking sleeping bags and insulating jackets. My guess is some piece of your outdoor kit (or even your bed comforter at home) is made of down.<\/p>\n

\n
\"When<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n
\n

Where does down come from?<\/h2>\n

Down is produced in 3 different ways, with a majority of down on the market produced in China.<\/p>\n

1. Collecting Down from Wild Eider Duck Nests<\/h3>\n

This is the only way to sustainably produce down where the ducks are not harmed or killed for the meat industry. Eider ducks are wild birds that live in arctic and subarctic coastal marine environments in the North Atlantic (mainly Iceland and Norway). <\/p>\n

When the mother eiders are laying their nests, they pluck their own down in order to line their nest and incubate their eggs. Once the eggs hatch, the mother and her ducklings abandon the nest and head out to sea. Then, harvesters or \u201cfarmers\u201d come through and collect the down from the nests.<\/p>\n

Before you get too excited about this type of down, eiderdown comforters cost anywhere from $5,000 to $16,000. Because of the cost, my guess is most of us don\u2019t have and will never own outdoor gear made from eider ducks.<\/p>\n

2. Live plucking<\/h3>\n

A practice that the industry claims is rare, live-plucking is when geese and ducks are restrained and plucked alive. This process can start when the geese are as young as 6 weeks old and is repeated up to 6 times before they are killed for their meat\u00b9. <\/p>\n

Since they are plucked multiple times before death, this practice produces more down than plucking a single time after slaughter. This is painful and considered one of the cruelest ways to produce down. <\/p>\n

3. Plucked after Slaughter for Meat<\/h3>\n

The third and most common source of down comes from plucking the geese and ducks after they have been killed for meat. After the ducks and geese are killed, they are dropped in scalding water for 1-3 minutes which makes the feathers and down easier to pluck.<\/p>\n

In 2017, nearly 3.7 billion ducks and geese were killed for the global meat trade\u00b2. The largest demand for geese and duck meat is in China (6 million tons a year), followed by France and Myanmar. By 2025, the global market is expected to reach nearly 9 million tons of duck and geese\u00b3.<\/p>\n


\n

How are geese and ducks raised and what are the animal welfare concerns?<\/h2>\n

A majority of ducks and geese are raised for meat on factory farms and never see the sun or water to swim in. The down is a byproduct of this process. Living indoors without water to swim in deprives them of their natural habitat and instincts and many of the animals show signs of distress in these conditions.<\/p>\n

Issues on Industrial Duck and Geese Farms<\/h3>\n

The duck farm below is typical of the United States, but keep in mind that 80% of duck and geese are produced in China. <\/p>\n

\"When<\/figure>\n

According to the Food Empowerment Project, on US industrial duck farms, \u201covercrowded conditions and a lack of natural stimulation cause the birds to peck and pull at their own feathers and the feathers of nearby ducks. Rather than satisfy even their most basic instinctual needs, the industry chooses to cut or burn part of their upper bill without the use of anesthetics. Despite its rigidity, the bill is sensitive to pain and the trimming process is stressful\u2074.\u201d Trimming also causes bleeding, tissue damage, and often has to be repeated\u2075. <\/p>\n

Furthermore, ducks are meant to spend their lives in water and their legs are not meant to hold up their bodies all day long. Their legs and feet often become infected, rendering them unable to walk.<\/p>\n

When ducks are transported to the slaughterhouse, broken wings and limbs are common and they can be deprived of food and water for up to 36 hours before their death. Finally, as they go to slaughter, some of the birds are still alive when dropped in the scalding water, essentially boiling them alive. <\/p>\n

Issues with Foie Gras Production<\/h3>\n

The other major animal welfare issue with ducks and geese is the production of foie gras, which requires force-feeding. Most foie gras is produced by confining birds to small cages where they are unable to move. A large feeding tube is stuck down their throat, pumping high-fat corn mash into their stomachs. This lasts between 12-15 days, causes enormous discomfort and damage to the esophagus, and results in a liver that is 7-10 times larger than normal\u2076. <\/p>\n


\n

What is the Responsible Down Standard?<\/h2>\n

The above information made me feel really uncomfortable and question whether down can ever be ethical. I personally don\u2019t want my sleeping bag made from geese and ducks raised in this way.<\/p>\n

Fortunately, in response to animal abuse and welfare concerns, the Textile Industry developed the Responsible Down Standard (RDS)<\/a> and many popular outdoor companies, such as REI and The North Face have committed to sourcing their down products in accordance with the Responsible Down standard.<\/p>\n

All down products certified by the Responsible Down Standard must not come from live-plucked or force-fed birds. In addition, producers must commit to the protection of the five freedoms:<\/p>\n